tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-102220162011-04-22T12:12:58.019+08:00CSEWSCSEWSnoreply@blogger.comBlogger101100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106205610973793682005-01-20T15:20:00.000+08:002005-01-20T15:20:10.973+08:00i tink i understd y A/P Hawkins tinks tt there isn't a problem wif the equating social interactions & social well-being.
<br />
<br />as i dig out all e history o e study, i found tt actually the definition of social well-being had been established from the very start as how well the child interacts wif e others. So in A/P Hawkins opinion wat i'm currently doing, finding scales to measure interactions, is essentially correct.
<br />
<br />my problem is that i find the definition is wrong, how can u equate social well-being with simply social interactions. So now i've 2 dig further & find how they came up wif the definition. was there any study tt established that social well-being is social interactions.
<br />
<br />i need 2 get this point across to the RAs.
<br />
<br />now i can write the email.
<br />
<br />i shld have done a beta job at looking at the study's history but i didnt....i was busy trying my best to brush up on the topic....i was trying very hard not 2 look stupid....
<br />
<br />i shld have had a beta grasp o e study if i studied e history of the study.
<br />
<br />now i've 2 b thick-skinned & ask them abt e history....there isn't a lot o things written in e minutes....
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110620561097379368?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106128115845943092005-01-19T17:42:00.000+08:002005-01-19T17:48:35.846+08:00however since absolutely nothing can be equated....
<br />
<br />tt's y we have e simple relationship o interactions/relationships o child wif others = social well-being o e child
<br />
<br />but r there studies supporting this relationship?
<br />
<br />fr my lit search, relationships/interactions r related to social well-being & they can predict 2 a certain extent how socially well e child is......
<br />
<br />so is tt simple relationship valid????
<br />
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110612811584594309?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106127685075380492005-01-19T17:40:00.000+08:002005-01-19T17:41:25.076+08:00discussion wif mas....
<br />
<br />interactions not equals to social well-being.....
<br />
<br />there's more to social well-being then interactions.....
<br />
<br />same rationale fr HS.....
<br />
<br />
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110612768507538049?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106127310600729712005-01-19T17:34:00.000+08:002005-01-19T17:35:10.600+08:00Annie..... says:
<br />i'm asking u abt e study
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />i'm stuck on e study
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />i'm not sure if when i measure the interactions o chidl & others, m i measurin gtheir social well-being
<br />topaz says:
<br />social skills is more of interaction
<br />topaz says:
<br />thats my 2 cents opinion la.
<br />topaz says:
<br />may not be correct
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />so when i measure how well they interact & also their relationship wif others
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />i can tell u their social well-being?
<br />topaz says:
<br />how abt u chaange it to social skills instead?
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />change wat 2 social skills?
<br />topaz says:
<br />social well being social skills
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />my study is trying 2 find e social well-being
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />not 2 find social skills
<br />topaz says:
<br />lemme aks my mates here.
<br />topaz says:
<br />hang on
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />great
<br />topaz says:
<br />okie they say social well being is like examining their social interaction btw children n teachers n parents beyond the acad context
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />so tt means
<br />topaz says:
<br />?
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />wheni measure all e social interactions btw children, teacher, parent, siblings etc etc
<br />topaz says:
<br />correct!
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />it is social well-being?
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />really?
<br />topaz says:
<br />hmmm!
<br />Annie..... says:
<br />tt's hawkins' pt o view also.....
<br />topaz says:
<br />i think so, thats what they told me
<br />
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110612731060072971?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106127152495559432005-01-19T17:32:00.000+08:002005-01-19T17:32:32.496+08:00Annie says:
<br />u've time 2 read my CSEWS blog?
<br />Annie says:
<br />look at e most recent 1
<br />Annie says:
<br />on well being & interations
<br />Annie says:
<br />interactions i mean
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />tell me what you want me to look out for in particular
<br />Annie says:
<br />interactions/relationships r only related 2 well-being
<br />Annie says:
<br />but in my study i'm measuring interactions/relationships
<br />Annie says:
<br />then i'm supposed 2 conclude on e social well-being o e chidl
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />no, I mean, you want me to lok out for grammar, flow, punctuation...
<br />Annie says:
<br />no i'm trying 2 ask there's a missing part between interactions/relationships & well-being....
<br />Annie says:
<br />but i juz can't pin it.....
<br />Annie says:
<br />& i 1 2 tell my RA but he dun tink there's anything missing...
<br />Annie says:
<br />i'm being sitting on e issue 4 e longest time...
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />intellectual capacity? tell me what you are looking for?
<br />Annie says:
<br />i 1 2 ask u if my rationale tt smething is amiss between e interactions & well-being is correct or not
<br />Annie says:
<br />but i dunno wat is amiss.....
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />yeah I got that part. I'm just wondering what you feel is missing... as in, can you describe it vaguely even.
<br />Annie says:
<br />i ask my other ROs they tink so 2....
<br />Annie says:
<br />tt's e pt....
<br />Annie says:
<br />i dunno....
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />well, I think intellectual capacity is one
<br />Annie says:
<br />????
<br />Annie says:
<br />how intelligent a person is
<br />Annie says:
<br />affects social well-being?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />Of course, it shapes the way we view the world
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />and it affects the way people view us
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />the relative intellectuality is important.
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />v smart pp don't mix with lower ed pp well, and vv
<br />Annie says:
<br />so when i measure their interactions wif diff pple in their lives
<br />Annie says:
<br />i can safely say tt i'm measuring their social well-being?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />There's the Heisenberg principle of uncertainty. When you observe or measure something, you change it
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />so you can't safely say that you are measuring their social well-being accurately
<br />Annie says:
<br />however in a nutshell, with all other things being constant
<br />Annie says:
<br />i can say tt as long as i can measure how well e child interacts wif e other pple i can tell u how their social well-being is rite?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />hm...
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />i guess,
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />but you'll have to ask a real psychologist
<br />Annie says:
<br />tt's e trouble here
<br />Annie says:
<br />my RA is a psychologist la
<br />Annie says:
<br />then he say tt we r measuring social well-being
<br />Annie says:
<br />when we measure the interactions/relationship
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />then ask other psychologists lor.
<br />Annie says:
<br />tt's y i'm tapping on all my sources la
<br />Annie says:
<br />but fr a layman's pt o view?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />Tough question. Is social interactivity = social well-being? it then really depends o definition. What you mean by well-being
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />if you tell me his well-being means how well a person interacts, then yeah, it would have to be yes.
<br />Annie says:
<br />ok
<br />Annie says:
<br />but tt's my problem
<br />Annie says:
<br />i tink tt definition is not rite
<br />Annie says:
<br />e definition was passed down fr e previous person doing e student
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />so what is it that you wish to measure specifically?
<br />Annie says:
<br />e social well-being loh
<br />Annie says:
<br />they define it as measuring how well e child interacts wif others
<br />Annie says:
<br />then i can't find any lit search tt supports e pt tt social well being is e interaction
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />then I can't help anymore...
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />ask other psychologists lor. psychs are specialists, so your RA may not be a social psych-ist
<br />Annie says:
<br />but in ur opinion social well-being shldn't b juz measuring interactions rite?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />No. How well a person interacts, may not equate to how well a person fits the culture or situation. So even though I can interact very well with my friends, I may hate school for the simple reason that I don't like studying.
<br />Annie says:
<br />but socially, u r doing gd
<br />Annie says:
<br />even though u dun like studying
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />I guess that's correct
<br />Annie says:
<br />dun mind if i put it up on CSEWS rite?
<br />KJ: innocence says:
<br />go ahead, but I'm not a psych-ist, so it won't carry weight
<br />Annie says:
<br />no worries la...
<br />Annie says:
<br />all these r tinking aloud
<br />
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110612715249555943?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106120802876317812005-01-19T15:32:00.000+08:002005-01-19T15:46:42.876+08:00when we measure interactions/relationships between child & others, r we measuring e social well-being o e child?
<br />
<br />fr e limited lit search tt i've done, interactions/relationships r only related to well-being......they may predict but is not exactly e well-being.....
<br />
<br />but in hawkins' opinion when we measure the interactions/relationships, we r measuring the social well-being......
<br />
<br />
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110612080287631781?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106117385223405512005-01-19T11:02:00.000+08:002005-01-19T14:49:45.223+08:00Man, P. (1991). The influence of peers and parents on youth life satisfaction in Hong Kong. <em>Social Indicators Research, 24, 347-365</em>.
<br />
<br />"life satisfaction is often used interchageably with the concepts of social well-being and subjective life quality"
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110611738522340551?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106041437562019832005-01-18T16:47:00.000+08:002005-01-18T17:43:57.563+08:00mtg on 14.01.05 note 2 myself:
<br />
<br />mtg on 14.01.05 at A/P Hawkins' office in NIE
<br />
<br />looked at e different scales (include MSLSS, SLSS, ICQ, loneliness & social dissatisfaction scale, & another scale fr e HK article)
<br />
<br />basically decided tt MSLSS looks relevant
<br />
<br />will look at e NRI, yet 2 get e scale fr e author.....
<br />
<br />discussed e diff bet quantitaitve & qualitative qns.....
<br />
<br />bottom line, e behavior scales only list e types/frequecies o behavior......
<br />
<br />so we need 2 measure e interactions.....
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />another scale NRI
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110604143756201983?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106015677128908662005-01-18T10:34:00.000+08:002005-01-18T10:34:37.126+08:00testingtesting....
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110601567712890866?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10222016.post-1106013050397041872005-01-18T09:49:00.000+08:002005-01-18T09:50:50.396+08:00CSEWSCSEWS - Children's Social & Emotional Well-Being
<br />
<br />my study......save me all e trouble o lugging all e articles ard nie or nus....so i dun get all e aches fr e heavy load.....
<br />
<br />also 4 pple 2 comment on e articles & also 2 contribute any articles tt they find useful! thks in advance
<br /><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10222016-110601305039704187?l=csews.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>CSEWSnoreply@blogger.com0